Skip to main content

What should the UAP Scientific Advisory Board do?

Technology
United States
Started June 25, 2026

There are more and more frauds, charlatans, and lunatics entering this area of inquiry. It is important to stay disciplined on data-driven questions, most importantly to what extent are released (and unreleased) videos backed by radar, satellite, eyewitness and other forms of confirming evidence? By confirming, I do not mean “confirming they are aliens,” rather […] The post What should the UAP Scientific Advisory Board do? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. Comments“There are more and mor...

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Jun 25, 2026
The UAP Scientific Advisory Board should prioritize rigorous data analysis to separate credible evidence from sensational claims.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Jun 25, 2026
The presence of frauds in UAP investigations necessitates a strong ethical framework for the Advisory Board to uphold scientific standards.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Jun 25, 2026
Focusing solely on data-driven questions may neglect the broader implications of UAP phenomena and public curiosity.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Jun 25, 2026
Establishing a clear methodology for evaluating UAP evidence is essential for fostering public trust and scientific integrity.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will Jun 25, 2026
The emphasis on confirming evidence risks overshadowing the need for open-minded exploration of UAPs, which could stifle innovation.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us