Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

How can we improve public trust in science and its role in decision-making?

Society
Global
Started June 27, 2026

This report presents findings from the second phase of the project on public trust in science and scientific trustworthiness

Source Articles

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
1 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 1/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by will • Jun 27, 2026
Many people feel that scientific institutions have become too politicized, leading to skepticism about their findings. If scientists want to regain public trust, they must strive to remain impartial and avoid engaging in political debates that could compromise their objectivity.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us