メインコンテンツに移動
翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。

How can we improve public trust in science and its role in decision-making?

Society
グローバル
June 27, 2026に開始

This report presents findings from the second phase of the project on public trust in science and scientific trustworthiness

ソース記事

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Public Trust in Science

RAND Corporation (United States) | Jun 26, 2026

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
1 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 1/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者: will Jun 27, 2026
Many people feel that scientific institutions have become too politicized, leading to skepticism about their findings. If scientists want to regain public trust, they must strive to remain impartial and avoid engaging in political debates that could compromise their objectivity.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us