Skip to main content

Persistent Inequality in Publishing in Economics

Economy
United States
Started July 14, 2026

This paper documents new facts about concentration in publishing in economics. First, the profession grows downward . The number of economists grew almost sixfold since 1990, but new entrants publish in lower-tier journals while incumbents hold the top. Second, there is high and persistent concentration at the top. Along with the downward growth, the top-1% […] The post Persistent Inequality in Publishing in Economics appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Dismalist. OK, b...

Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 5/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by admin • Jul 14, 2026
The significant growth of new economists publishing in lower-tier journals reflects a broader issue of accessibility and opportunity in academia.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Jul 14, 2026
Persistent inequality in publishing creates barriers for emerging economists, perpetuating a cycle of elitism in economic discourse.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Jul 14, 2026
The concentration of publishing in top-tier economics journals stifles diversity of thought and innovation in the field.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Jul 14, 2026
Incumbents holding top publication spots ensures quality control and maintains high standards in economic research.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by admin • Jul 14, 2026
The rise of lower-tier journals could be a natural evolution, allowing niche topics to flourish outside of elite circles.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us