Ir para o conteúdo principal

Discussões de Notícias

Tópicos em destaque de jornalismo confiável, transformados em debates estruturados. Diferente de nossas discussões comunitárias, estes são automaticamente selecionados das notícias mais quentes para promover conversas oportunas e nuançadas.

Como isso é diferente de Explorar?

Discussões de Notícias são geradas automaticamente de histórias em destaque em tempo real. Discussões Explorar mostra tópicos criados pela comunidade sobre qualquer assunto. Ambas usam o mesmo formato de debate estruturado, mas Notícias se concentra em assuntos atuais.

Nossas Fontes de Notícias (156 outlets confiáveis)

Agregamos histórias dessas fontes respeitáveis para garantir cobertura equilibrada e de qualidade:

Acquired Podcast Africa Confidential Al Jazeera English Al Monitor All-In Podcast AllAfrica Americas Quarterly Andrew Sullivan Anne Applebaum Ars Technica Associated Press Axios BBC News BBC Sport BBC World Service Bloomberg Brookings Institution CSIS Caixin Global Carbon Brief Carnegie Endowment Cato Institute Channel NewsAsia Chartbook Chatham House Christianity Today City Journal Clean Energy Wire CoinDesk Columbia Journalism Review Commentary Magazine Commonweal Cory Doctorow Daily Maverick Daily Wire Decrypt Deutsche Welle Diary of a CEO E&E News ESPN El País América El País English Euractiv Eurostat Ezra Klein Farnam Street Financial Times First Things Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy France24 Francis Fukuyama Freddie deBoer Haaretz Hot Air Huberman Lab IEA IMF Ian Bremmer Institute for Fiscal Studies Institute for Government International Crisis Group Jonathan Rauch Law & Liberty Le Monde English Lex Fridman Podcast MIT Technology Review Mail & Guardian Manhattan Institute Marginal Revolution Matt Taibbi Modern Wisdom National Review Nature News New Statesman Nieman Lab Nikkei Asia Noahpinion Not Boring OECD Office for Budget Responsibility Office for National Statistics Our World in Data Paul Graham Pew Research Center Platformer Politico Politico EU Power Line Poynter ProPublica RAND Corporation Radical with Amol Rajan RealClearPolitics Reason Resolution Foundation Rest of World STAT News Science Magazine Semafor Simon Willison Sixth Tone Sky Sports Slow Boring South China Morning Post Spiegel International Straits Times Stratechery Tablet Magazine TechCrunch The American Conservative The Athletic The Atlantic The Block The Commentary Magazine The Conversation The Critic The Dispatch The Economist The Ezra Klein Show The Federalist The Free Press The Guardian The Independent The Intercept The Lancet The National The New York Times The New Yorker The News Agents The Observer The Pragmatic Engineer The Rest Is Politics The Slow Newscast The Spectator US The Telegraph The Tim Ferriss Show The Times The Verge Time Tortoise Media Triggernometry UK Parliament UN News US Census Bureau UnHerd Vox WHO Wall Street Journal War on the Rocks Washington Examiner Wired World Bank World Economic Forum Yascha Mounk Zeynep Tufekci
Mais Recentes Por Tópico Healthcare Environment Education Technology Economy Politics Society Infrastructure Geopolitics Business Culture
Politics

What are the possible impacts of legal actions against officials on public trust in government?

Former special counsel Jack Smith believes the Trump administration will indict him, he said during congressional testimony on Thursday. Why it matters: Smith's prediction follows the Trump administration's repeated prosecution of the president's political enemies. President Trump has called Smith a criminal. Driving the news: Hours into the public hearing, Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) asked Smith if he thinks the Justice Department would "find some way" to indict him. "I believe they will do everything in their power to do that because they have been ordered to by the president," Smith said. Balint responded, "That is very concerning." Context: Smith's Thursday testimony was his first public defense of Trump's prosecution. He previously testified before the panel in an eight-hour, closed-door session but sought an open forum to defend the investigation. Friction point: Trump, earlier in the afternoon, wrote on Truth Social that he hoped Attorney General Pam Bondi was "looking at what he's done." "Deranged Jack Smith is being DECIMATED before Congress," Trump wrote. " The president added Smith "shouldn't be allowed to practice Law." The White House referred Axios to Trump's Truth Social posts. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. The latest: "Trump has a playbook for how he handles people who try to hold him accountable," Balint said in her exchange with Smith. "I think the statements are meant to intimidate me," Smith said. "I will not be intimidated. I think these statements are also made as a warning to others — what will happen if they stand up.""We followed the facts and we followed the law and that process resulted in proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed serious crimes," he added. "I'm not going to pretend that didn't happen because he's threatening me." Go deeper: Jack Smith makes first public defense of Trump indictments

United States
Participar do debate