Skip to main content

News Discussions

Trending topics from trusted journalism, transformed into structured debates. Unlike our community discussions, these are automatically curated from breaking news to spark timely, nuanced conversation.

How is this different from Explore?

News Discussions are automatically generated from trending stories in real-time. Explore Discussions shows community-created topics on any subject. Both use the same structured debate format, but News focuses on current affairs.

Our News Sources (156 trusted outlets)

We aggregate stories from these reputable sources to ensure balanced, quality coverage:

Acquired Podcast Africa Confidential Al Jazeera English Al Monitor All-In Podcast AllAfrica Americas Quarterly Andrew Sullivan Anne Applebaum Ars Technica Associated Press Axios BBC News BBC Sport BBC World Service Bloomberg Brookings Institution CSIS Caixin Global Carbon Brief Carnegie Endowment Cato Institute Channel NewsAsia Chartbook Chatham House Christianity Today City Journal Clean Energy Wire CoinDesk Columbia Journalism Review Commentary Magazine Commonweal Cory Doctorow Daily Maverick Daily Wire Decrypt Deutsche Welle Diary of a CEO E&E News ESPN El País América El País English Euractiv Eurostat Ezra Klein Farnam Street Financial Times First Things Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy France24 Francis Fukuyama Freddie deBoer Haaretz Hot Air Huberman Lab IEA IMF Ian Bremmer Institute for Fiscal Studies Institute for Government International Crisis Group Jonathan Rauch Law & Liberty Le Monde English Lex Fridman Podcast MIT Technology Review Mail & Guardian Manhattan Institute Marginal Revolution Matt Taibbi Modern Wisdom National Review Nature News New Statesman Nieman Lab Nikkei Asia Noahpinion Not Boring OECD Office for Budget Responsibility Office for National Statistics Our World in Data Paul Graham Pew Research Center Platformer Politico Politico EU Power Line Poynter ProPublica RAND Corporation Radical with Amol Rajan RealClearPolitics Reason Resolution Foundation Rest of World STAT News Science Magazine Semafor Simon Willison Sixth Tone Sky Sports Slow Boring South China Morning Post Spiegel International Straits Times Stratechery Tablet Magazine TechCrunch The American Conservative The Athletic The Atlantic The Block The Commentary Magazine The Conversation The Critic The Dispatch The Economist The Ezra Klein Show The Federalist The Free Press The Guardian The Independent The Intercept The Lancet The National The New York Times The New Yorker The News Agents The Observer The Pragmatic Engineer The Rest Is Politics The Slow Newscast The Spectator US The Telegraph The Tim Ferriss Show The Times The Verge Time Tortoise Media Triggernometry UK Parliament UN News US Census Bureau UnHerd Vox WHO Wall Street Journal War on the Rocks Washington Examiner Wired World Bank World Economic Forum Yascha Mounk Zeynep Tufekci
Politics

How should Congress balance national security with limiting the President's power in decisions about Iran?

House Democrats left a Tuesday night briefing on Iran expressing even greater frustration towards the Trump administration than they had going in, with several lawmakers describing it as "bullsht." Why it matters: Democrats are full steam ahead on forcing a vote this week on a resolution that would constrain Trump from unilaterally waging war with Iran. Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.), one of House Democrats' most vulnerable battleground-district members, said his thinking was "not at all" changed by the briefing and that he will be "supporting our resolution."'They're coming in and bullshting us just like . they did with Venezuela," said Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.), another swing-district Democrat.Even Rep. Jim Costa (D-Calif.), who is backing a softer, centrist alternative to the war powers resolution that Democratic leadership is pushing, said coming out of the briefing that he supports both measures. State of play: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs chair Dan Caine briefed senators on Tuesday afternoon and House members later that evening. "It was one of the most productive briefings I've been a part of," Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) told reporters. "I think that they assuaged a lot of concerns."Republicans and Democrats alike pressed the briefers on the administration's plan to evacuate Americans stuck in the Middle East, according to multiple lawmakers."A couple of Republicans asked that question. 'How are we going to get those people out, I'm getting calls from constituents,'" Rep. Gil Cisneros (D-Calif.) told Axios. Yes, but: Other than that mild pushback, the briefing went pretty much as one would expect, lawmakers said, with Republicans largely praising the operation and Democrats feeling ignored and uninformed. "When the Republicans came up to ask questions, they just wanted to kiss Donald Trump's and Pete Hegseth's ass," said Min. "They stonewalled on Democratic questions and just said, '

United States
Politics

What changes might we see in Bangladesh after the new government takes over?

Bangladesh's interim leader Muhammad Yunus stepped down on Monday before handing over to an elected government led by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and its leader Tarique Rahman. Bangladeshi voters held national elections and endorsed sweeping democratic reforms via referendum in February following the overthrow of Sheikh Hasina and her iron-fisted government

France
Politics

What should be done to support the health and rights of imprisoned individuals like Narges Mohammadi in Iran?

(Corrects paragraph 6 to add dropped words about Iran war) May 2 (Reuters) - Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi was in an Iranian hospital after a "catastrophic deterioration of her health," including a "cardiac crisis", a foundation run by her family said. The secretary of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which awarded Mohammadi the 2023 prize, expressed concern on Thursday that the condition of the Iranian human rights activist was worsening after she had suffered a heart attack in prison

Iran