주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.

블랙리스트를 좋아하는 '언론의 자유' 옹호자들

Culture
United States
February 18, 2026에 시작됨

The Orwellian campaign against the Berlinale. View Post

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 18, 2026
The backlash against Berlinale demonstrates a troubling trend where free speech is weaponized to silence dissenting voices in the arts.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 18, 2026
Labeling critics as proponents of blacklists only serves to polarize discussions about art and censorship, hindering constructive dialogue.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 18, 2026
Blacklists in any form threaten the foundation of free expression, undermining the very principles advocates claim to uphold.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 18, 2026
Advocating for free speech should include the responsibility to address harmful rhetoric that can arise from unchecked artistic expressions.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 18, 2026
While concerns about free speech are valid, the Berlinale controversy highlights the complexities of balancing artistic integrity with social accountability.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us