What are the possible benefits and risks of lifting oil sanctions on Iran for the U.S. and the world?
The White House is considering lifting sanctions on Iranian oil that's at sea to keep oil prices down, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Thursday. Why it matters: The administration is pulling out all the stops — even easing up an economic threat to its enemy in war — to keep down oil prices. The latest: The price of Brent crude, the global benchmark, spiked 10% in just the past 24 hours, driving increasing worries among investors. Brent is now around $111 per barrel — nearly 60% higher than pre-war levels. Zoom in: "In the coming days, we may unsanction the Iranian oil that's on the water," Bessent told Fox Business Thursday morning. He said that would make up about 140 million barrels — about 10 days to two weeks of supply."In essence, we'd be using the Iranian barrels against the Iranians to keep the price down for the next 10 or 14 days, as we continue this campaign. So, we have lots of levers." The big picture: The White House has been able for the past few weeks to contain prices with various assurances and policies — promising tanker escorts through the critical Strait of Hormuz, waiving the Jones Act, and temporarily lifting sanctions on Russian oil. Zoom out Lifting sanctions on Iranian oil would be a remarkable next step — as it was something Iranians were asking for in negotiations last year. The White House referred Axios' questions about Iranian sanctions to the Treasury Department, which didn't immediately respond to a request for comment or more details. The bottom line: The administration appears to be conceding something in war that it was unwilling to give in peace, says Nicholas Mulder, a sanctions expert and professor at Cornell University. "The U.S. has to dial back sanctions to offset the second order effect of war," he says. "It speaks to the instability of the situation."
Source Articles
Al Monitor (United States) | Mar 19, 2026
Al Monitor (United States) | Mar 19, 2026
Axios (United States) | Mar 19, 2026
Politico EU (Belgium) | Mar 19, 2026
Semafor (United States) | Mar 19, 2026
Bloomberg (United States) | Mar 20, 2026
Decrypt (United States) | Mar 20, 2026
The New York Times (United States) | Mar 21, 2026
The Guardian (United Kingdom) | Mar 21, 2026
Politico EU (Belgium) | Mar 21, 2026
BBC World Service (United Kingdom) | Mar 20, 2026
Channel NewsAsia (Singapore) | Mar 23, 2026
Semafor (United States) | Mar 22, 2026
France24 (France) | Mar 23, 2026
The New York Times (United States) | Mar 23, 2026
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us