How should the government balance safety concerns with the development of new technology like AI?
The Trump administration has asked OpenAI to limit the release of its next model, GPT-5.6, to only a small set of government-approved partners before any wider release, citing security concerns, according to a source familiar with the matter. Why it matters: This marks the first time the U.S. government has preemptively asked an American AI company to restrict the launch of a model before release. Driving the news: The White House's Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Science and Technology Policy asked OpenAI to limit the rollout of GPT-5.6 as the administration builds a framework for testing and evaluating the security of new models, per the source. The Information reported earlier Thursday that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman shared the plans for a limited rollout in a memo to employees. "We've made clear to the U.S. government that this is not our preferred long term model, and will work with them and others in industry to achieve a more sustainable approach for future releases," Altman said in the memo, according to The Information. Between the lines: The source told Axios that OpenAI has been proactively working with the administration on the model release since before Anthropic revoked access to its frontier models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, over a rare Commerce Department directive. The White House has been looped in on the capabilities of OpenAI's new model and has been able to preview its abilities. Behind the scenes: Altman discussed GPT-5.6 with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Wednesday, Axios has learned. Lutnick wanted to be sure all relevant parts of the government have tested and approved the model, a source familiar with the situation told us. The source said the government intervened because GPT-5.6 has "Mythos-like" capability, not because the administration is suddenly taking a heavier hand."This is what's happening with models of that caliber," the source said. The models are so powerful that the administration wants to be sure the co
Artigos de Fontes
Axios (United States) | 8 de jul. de 2026
Channel NewsAsia (Singapore) | 8 de jul. de 2026
TechCrunch (United States) | 1 de jul. de 2026
Financial Times (United Kingdom) | 1 de jul. de 2026
Axios (United States) | 25 de jun. de 2026
TechCrunch (United States) | 25 de jun. de 2026
Semafor (United States) | 26 de jun. de 2026
Channel NewsAsia (Singapore) | 26 de jun. de 2026
Wired (United States) | 26 de jun. de 2026
Decrypt (United States) | 26 de jun. de 2026
TechCrunch (United States) | 26 de jun. de 2026
Decrypt (United States) | 26 de jun. de 2026
The National (United Arab Emirates) | 26 de jun. de 2026
Axios (United States) | 29 de jun. de 2026
Seus votos contam
Não é preciso ter conta. Seus votos são salvos e incluídos na análise de consenso. Crie uma conta para manter um registro dos seus votos.
Tradução pendente
Tradução pendente
💡 Como funciona
- • Adicione afirmações: Publique afirmações ou perguntas (de 10 a 500 caracteres).
- • Vote: Concordo, discordo ou não tenho certeza em cada afirmação.
- • Responda: Adicione argumentos detalhados a favor ou contra, com evidências.
- • Consenso: Quando pessoas suficientes participarem, a análise mostra os grupos de opinião e onde eles concordam.
Society Speaks é aberto e independente. Seu apoio mantém o debate cívico livre de publicidade e de influência comercial.
Apoie-nos