Aller au contenu principal

Discussions d'actualité

Sujets tendance issus du journalisme de confiance, transformés en débats structurés. Contrairement à nos discussions communautaires, ceux-ci sont générés automatiquement à partir des dernières actualités pour stimuler une conversation opportune et nuancée.

En quoi c'est différent de Explorer ?

Les Discussions d'actualité sont générées automatiquement à partir des histoires tendance en temps réel. Explorer Discussions affiche les sujets créés par la communauté sur n'importe quel sujet. Les deux utilisent le même format de débat structuré, mais News se concentre sur l'actualité.

Nos sources d'actualité (156 médias de confiance)

Nous agrégeons les histoires de ces sources réputées pour garantir une couverture équilibrée et de qualité :

Acquired Podcast Africa Confidential Al Jazeera English Al Monitor All-In Podcast AllAfrica Americas Quarterly Andrew Sullivan Anne Applebaum Ars Technica Associated Press Axios BBC News BBC Sport BBC World Service Bloomberg Brookings Institution CSIS Caixin Global Carbon Brief Carnegie Endowment Cato Institute Channel NewsAsia Chartbook Chatham House Christianity Today City Journal Clean Energy Wire CoinDesk Columbia Journalism Review Commentary Magazine Commonweal Cory Doctorow Daily Maverick Daily Wire Decrypt Deutsche Welle Diary of a CEO E&E News ESPN El País América El País English Euractiv Eurostat Ezra Klein Farnam Street Financial Times First Things Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy France24 Francis Fukuyama Freddie deBoer Haaretz Hot Air Huberman Lab IEA IMF Ian Bremmer Institute for Fiscal Studies Institute for Government International Crisis Group Jonathan Rauch Law & Liberty Le Monde English Lex Fridman Podcast MIT Technology Review Mail & Guardian Manhattan Institute Marginal Revolution Matt Taibbi Modern Wisdom National Review Nature News New Statesman Nieman Lab Nikkei Asia Noahpinion Not Boring OECD Office for Budget Responsibility Office for National Statistics Our World in Data Paul Graham Pew Research Center Platformer Politico Politico EU Power Line Poynter ProPublica RAND Corporation Radical with Amol Rajan RealClearPolitics Reason Resolution Foundation Rest of World STAT News Science Magazine Semafor Simon Willison Sixth Tone Sky Sports Slow Boring South China Morning Post Spiegel International Straits Times Stratechery Tablet Magazine TechCrunch The American Conservative The Athletic The Atlantic The Block The Commentary Magazine The Conversation The Critic The Dispatch The Economist The Ezra Klein Show The Federalist The Free Press The Guardian The Independent The Intercept The Lancet The National The New York Times The New Yorker The News Agents The Observer The Pragmatic Engineer The Rest Is Politics The Slow Newscast The Spectator US The Telegraph The Tim Ferriss Show The Times The Verge Time Tortoise Media Triggernometry UK Parliament UN News US Census Bureau UnHerd Vox WHO Wall Street Journal War on the Rocks Washington Examiner Wired World Bank World Economic Forum Yascha Mounk Zeynep Tufekci
Geopolitics

What are the possible effects of the US's actions in Iran on peace and safety in the region?

The United States may need to "escalate" its attacks against Iran to be able to wind down the war, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday, after President Donald Trump gave seemingly contradictory trajectories for the US military campaign. Trump on Saturday threatened to "obliterate" Iranian energy plants if Tehran did not fully open the pivotal Strait of Hormuz, just a day after saying US objectives were "very close" and that he was considering "winding down" the war

Global
Geopolitics

What are the possible effects of US military actions on oil trade and international relations in the region?

The US military declared on Saturday it had taken out an Iranian bunker housing weapons threatening oil and gas shipments in the Strait of Hormuz, as thousands of Iranians marked Eid al-Fitr with prayer. The US statement appeared designed to calm the concerns of energy markets and of Washington's sceptical international allies, more than 20 of whom issued a statement vowing to back efforts to re-open the key sea lane

Global
Geopolitics

What are the benefits and challenges of the U.S. being involved in NATO compared to supporting Gulf allies?

By Steve Holland and Gram Slattery MIAMI, March 27 (Reuters) - Donald Trump said on Friday the United States does not "have to be there for NATO," comments that again raised questions about the U.S. president's commitment to the mutual defense provisions at the center of the transatlantic alliance. Speaking to an investment forum in Miami on Friday night, Trump said he was upset that European NATO countries had declined to provide material support to the U.S. as it nears the fourth week of its ongoing war on Iran

United States